I'm more interested in the statistic department of this comparison. Game play, play style and etc. are secondary criteria for me. For example - how faster is the SR buffed in comparison to other 2 archers (also fully buffed); how much more attack speed and critical chance does it have (if that is the case). If the SR hasn't got considerably more speed, crit. chance and attack speed than other archers, then it is really no use of it (more or less). Thank you for providing that HP table, it gives the idea of how much the CON difference between PR and HE provides in HP pool difference; we probably wouldn't be wrong to consider that it gives ~17.3% more stun resist, which makes the CON statistics pretty important in PvP, compared to STR and the inferior DEX stats. Would be interesting to know how much does the superior critical power of the PR provides per normal attack, in comparison to other 2. For example, if fully buffed the PR crits for 2k, HE crits for 1.9k, SR crits for 1.7k or it is a completely different scaling. So, probably people are not wrong at all picking up the HE out of the bunch as it sounds like the best and well-rounded of all three, statistics-wise at least. Any personal preferences are not a matter of dispute or measurement.
