driver

​I miss your politics on our server Perks became a bit pu ssy cryers ​those pus sy cryers close LoA every prime. gg ​Dont forget whose prime time we playing mass pvp, cause my alliance miss every time strong parties cause of time, even my party is always half i agree, but ​this is main reason u guys are high lvl, and i think by lvl we are lower even when your party and your mages are not online.

​ ​I need 1h of non stop farming at aoe kariks and not like perkunas doing it, I'm talking about luring the spot from bridge all kariks to bridge of snipers, the whole spot, that for 1h is 1% exp at 75. So who will lose more, you at 65 or me at 75? You talk about lvls you talk about PR you talk about bots and guess what it reminds me, your alliance. In my alliance, nobody get banned cause of botting man, check yours. So what you say, you want to pvp with our alt clans that few people there still doesn't have ready parties? Nice goals you have there at tt. We can't kill our war so open war with your alt clans and alt chars to be able to kill you I want some standart to pvp, fair play, 3-4high lvls(+2kCP) vs 6-7 low is playable and both side have chance to win it. Gf But your standart is take 2x more high players, kill half Pt, DA/SK giving para/fear and killing last players for 4% with dual boxs or try drops eq from us. Its poor hate and u just try poison this game your enemy. We dont play CP system(Constants Parties), we havent time on it and we want play with more players, not only 9-13 as u. So yes, u can open wars with your alt clans, with same lvls us our mains chars, everyone know it than almost chars r your secondary chars, example clan inferno, EV we kill it, they relog it and same spot log in taduliz/tipitapi or dee. ?(Btw nice Bsoe Dee) But after u just dont kill so easy enemy. U probably dont see it, how many players stop playing here when 70+players killing them in location for 20-55 lvls. Droping from them weapons/armors. About bots, i talk with Koll. He say me when they give every bot perma ban when gm catch him first time, we will play with 50% lowers population. Do u still think than all players from your ally r clear? Now boters have paradise here, high lvls try poison game news players, patch 2.0 have delay as hell, H5 coming to February. U will see how many fair play ally players, enemies or neutrals leave. Gl with thrash as ProGressive, sws Laste is not rly SE. ? Joke of day. CP = clan party ???? ​The only thing i can see here is you wishing this server go deep down so our ally stay alone and then start on new server casue you low lvl on this one Lots of hate and posion in you stiba it might be cause all your archer member get 2 shot from high lvl mages Tip 1st get some power and levels then choose side You mess with the big bad boys you get what you came for ​i read only your post, would like to comment it. your tip is the deffinition of vigi ally, you guys didnt fight till u got high lvl. but it doesnt work that way. this guys play for fun, like all of us.

​talking about ganking 4-5 active people with a full pt?), i think those mages 64-66 max good music, good for lowbies. but seems boring, i think all people from both sides who fight every day in loa can record something more interesting then ganking. dunno about u guys, but i would put a video where i made something hard - not something easy, winning by being the underdog.

​interestng to know l2classicclub online

​maybe u are not playing same server as we play rr, bsoe, pr is gameplay. for example we farm bs in 4-6 active people and comes 4 players who are higher lvl who try to gang - they bsoe/die AND in 10 min comes 9 active. so we bsoe/pr. u will never get a fair fight in ganks, on our server people from vigi could want gvg, because they dont have what to do. we have to level up, we dont have even 1 CP who are all 72+

​its because people like to watch something beautiful and efficient. i think a boosted archer 74-75 would be also nice, but not one of those newbs from ES.

stop it people, those are gangs. everywhere people post movies with gangs where they have won and its obvious they had advantage.

well, we also pvp at enemy flags and wars were insta resping. on a siege there was a battle were both sides had flags and after a long pvp perk won. i remember how we aoe at flags and the chat was blue. my point is that we have same advantages. and we dont even know who will win more from exp lose.

i'd like to see them trying to defend their 2 castles against both alliances at once since they're so good, and see how it goes. but then the hopes for a 3rd side would probably vanish like a fart in the wind ​when unique stand on their knees to join vigi, that was the moment when 3rd side vanished. it was till vigi recruited people in WW and the clan Syndicate, perk also made recruitment. which means even if ES+Unique ally existed they couldnt be competitive with other sides. btw, nobody really talked about it. unique are such pussies that instad of recruiting new players, so they could compete in euro prime against vigi and perkunas - they just switched sides. and ofc i guess soil loved it:), they used ES so they can take a castle, now using Vigi so they dont fail. alone those guys are nobody, and they dont have possibility or brain to craft something good, they only destroy. but now i know why they didnt want to play with those newbs ES.

​overall lvls in perkunas are low, numbers are lower then vigi and ofc ES are weak and it will not make big difference. (dont count china) vigi biggest online is when perk work and es sleep, so no big deal i guess. times passes, if our server is still alive it means dimination will switch at time to time.

​i was once online at night, 3 pt of ES reloged on ramp till we go to sleep. in our clan war perkunas is not -234)), guess its a bit bugged. i saw how u make crp, full party of 74 arcehrs gangs SOS or full party of mages 72+ gank AB. even if u have 1k score for each the situation will not change. its so easy to argue with ES, they cant even write something consistent. i just said that if u were at euro prime u had no chance and would have to kiss soil or biz ass. btw, after u posted this screen i know im right. when i say u guys thing u are top, u think u are elite :))

​You do not have character but you live in the forum talking trash? Making you the professional expert, but how nice is this ​ again u guys dont comment my words, but how i predicted try to hold on some low lvl trolling i feel how i touch your ego guys, i dont have nothing personal to any of u. im not a hater, i just observed what u were doing on this server. i think a guy who is a bit l2 knowledged understands me. the main reason your clan didnt fail or entered one top ally is your timezone, everybody knows unique made up a conflict to leave your ally. the presure they had at europrime made them to join vigi.

​big boys dont have time for u and your sandbox i dont like ES, no hate. they are newbies, all of them. i would help them hold those castles, its better then give them to war. u see, we dont even think ES is war, its just some random guys high lvl and get their as s kicked by guys lower lvls. ​You're not ashamed to say that. So let these rookies have a castle because "the big guys" do not have time ... what time? To use forum? hahahhaha we fight each other, i think its easy to understand what i said. if next siege we will be 60 ppl less then vigi, u dont stand a chance in having 1 castle.

dont put words i didnt say, we all amateurs. its just ES are so pathetic, born for pve. i dont have character p.s. from all i said u didnt comment sh1t, u just try to switch topic. u hope i am some 60 lvl archer who farms solo in fom and will troll me that i dont know sh1t.

​big boys dont have time for u and your sandbox i dont like ES, no hate. they are newbies, all of them. i would help them hold those castles, its better then give them to war. u see, we dont even think ES is war, its just some random guys high lvl and get their as s kicked by guys lower lvls.

​saw es on gludio were u got the thing with 40 ppl? perkunas 36 ppl make difference, even only one cp 72+ we were a bit less and levels lower, but had chance to take castle back. its not all about pvp head to head, it never was.

​it will be faster to go to village ​Wouldn't that add more strategy element to the fights? Either go to village , return to the fight faster but lose position. Or wait 10-15sec more and remain at a better positioning? ​there are more things that add strategy elements, like reuse of flags and clans with castle who cant put flags. we can talk whole day about how is better or how it could be. i would play in all posible ways, importat that all sides have equal chances. ​They would as numbers are quite even at the moment. My main concern is numbers on sieges have only been growing and growing and with the spawn on flags being as it is at the moment, very soon it will be impossible to break through ( its close to impossible now ). ​numbers on sieges dont grow, they went down from 195 vs 230 till 190 vs 170. we dont count Australia(ES), its far away - nobody cares about them

​You luckily kept oren.. ​the guy told u why your topic must be closed, but u saw only the thing he told about luck. im not suprised u took aden, u could take oren as well. u once said u better take less people with higher level, i can say u grandmaster in that - now u have more people with higher levels no hate, still nice siege. u were stronger ​185-190 VS 185-190 both sides, was a really good siege, this one and last.. every next siege is better! I didnt because wasn't fair the last poll, they were 2 splitted options as 1. We get that people don't like losing % at siege, so I chose to make a poll just with reuse time when you die and it's not a big deal. ​Problem with giving % penalty is some people won't show up ultimately making it feel less like an epic battle. No matter which side has more numbers I think ultimately the flag respawn zerg ruins pvp. With 40 mins left we made our final Aden push and actually got VR flag and had to split to castle and outside fight. Mainly ROK left outside and all they did was respawn zerg was till we were out of mana, utlimately making it unfun for both sides. 10-15 seconds is too low imho. 1-2 mins would be ideal. If you have it at 10-15 seconds it would still end up in a zerg till we win scenario. ​rofl, imagine how long 30s from castle npc takes, now imagine 1-2 mins resp. on flag, siege pvp ends in 1 s/d ​it will be faster to go to village ​Wouldn't that add more strategy element to the fights? Either go to village , return to the fight faster but lose position. Or wait 10-15sec more and remain at a better positioning? ​there are more things that add strategy elements, like reuse of flags and clans with castle who cant put flags. we can talk whole day about how is better or how it could be. i would play in all posible ways, importat that all sides have equal chances.

​You luckily kept oren.. ​the guy told u why your topic must be closed, but u saw only the thing he told about luck. im not suprised u took aden, u could take oren as well. u once said u better take less people with higher level, i can say u grandmaster in that - now u have more people with higher levels no hate, still nice siege. u were stronger ​185-190 VS 185-190 both sides, was a really good siege, this one and last.. every next siege is better! I didnt because wasn't fair the last poll, they were 2 splitted options as 1. We get that people don't like losing % at siege, so I chose to make a poll just with reuse time when you die and it's not a big deal. ​Problem with giving % penalty is some people won't show up ultimately making it feel less like an epic battle. No matter which side has more numbers I think ultimately the flag respawn zerg ruins pvp. With 40 mins left we made our final Aden push and actually got VR flag and had to split to castle and outside fight. Mainly ROK left outside and all they did was respawn zerg was till we were out of mana, utlimately making it unfun for both sides. 10-15 seconds is too low imho. 1-2 mins would be ideal. If you have it at 10-15 seconds it would still end up in a zerg till we win scenario. ​rofl, imagine how long 30s from castle npc takes, now imagine 1-2 mins resp. on flag, siege pvp ends in 1 s/d ​it will be faster to go to village

​You luckily kept oren.. ​the guy told u why your topic must be closed, but u saw only the thing he told about luck. im not suprised u took aden, u could take oren as well. u once said u better take less people with higher level, i can say u grandmaster in that - now u have more people with higher levels no hate, still nice siege. u were stronger ​185-190 VS 185-190 both sides, was a really good siege, this one and last.. every next siege is better! I didnt because wasn't fair the last poll, they were 2 splitted options as 1. We get that people don't like losing % at siege, so I chose to make a poll just with reuse time when you die and it's not a big deal. ​i dont care about death penalty or resp time at flag, if all sides have the same opportunities why not. funny that in early sieges nobody from your side said a thing about this things at sieges. btw, we were less. saw 3 screens from different ppl and talked to 2 other people. u were 185-200, against us 160-180, but it doesnt matter because 20-30 ppl dont make the difference in such pvp.

i think in such way the hero skills and weapons will make an insane boost our wars for example play more, are higher levels and outnumber us, if they get 20 heroes there will be no pvp won by us in daily and server will transform in swamp. i saw on ru off how hero skills work and how much damage hero weapon inflicts, and its ugly)

​let it be a bonus, for reporting bug

​You luckily kept oren.. ​the guy told u why your topic must be closed, but u saw only the thing he told about luck. im not suprised u took aden, u could take oren as well. u once said u better take less people with higher level, i can say u grandmaster in that - now u have more people with higher levels no hate, still nice siege. u were stronger

​so u missed alot more, there was multiple sieges we were defending 2 castles at once. This time got lucky for short amount of time ​well cant say its luck, we had moments where we could take it back, but didnt use them properly. there is a limit of posibilities. if we had like 30-50 people more then enemy, i think this would be more easy. 160 ppl in cc in middle of siege. p.s. where are the trolls?

​mm, ok. btw, only in last fight when all vigi ally came to oren, we moved our ally to help at oren. till then only perkunas def oren.