Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/11/15 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    Ya'll need to keep in mind 1 thing; Right now the admin said there is no dual box unless you pay for PA, and that gives you 1 box. PP is much better than WC in classic because VR doesn't do much, and with a PP you get berserker spirit + direct heals to kill faster and compensate for the lack of ''hp drain'' from VR, PP is also a lot easier/faster to buff when OOP (don't have to kick some1 if your party is full), you will have WW to run to places and in-between mobs faster, you don't run out of mp after you've fully buffed yourself like a WC, PP is more useful than WC in pvp and you also have a res. The only 2 advantages of a WC is 1. buffs full party faster for pvp and 2. can solo exp easier at early lvls.
  2. 1 point
    ​Meh, neither class brings too much to the table up to level 49, they're practically both just DD's until then as the BD's only useful skill is dance of fire (I suppose you can make an argument for dance of light for certain exp spots, and even then for a mage party is just as useless as a SwS. The SWS gets warding and wind, Neither class brings much to a party for PVE at this point, the BD party is going to down mobs a little quicker with dance of fire fire and the sws party is going to take less damage from magical attacks/have some more movement speed. Either way, both aren't going to make a huge amount of difference to a parties overall exp/hour. (depending on the size of the party/hunting area, as you get higher levels it gets better but at that point they also get more songs/dances) You could argue it's more efficient to take another DD rather than getting a BD/SWS sub level 50 but if people are going to try and be that efficient outside of CP's then they are insane. All in all I don't think BD's/SwS's will have a problem getting a party, because everyone wants to make friends with those classes you're going to need later on.
  3. 1 point
    ​No, but he said (in the title) "on test" ​owned .. didnt saw it
  4. 1 point
    I believe he could have already stipulated a date.
  5. 1 point
    August 31st, 23:59:59PM