Pepon

about 3. its as u said, u dont get crp at 76 cos its custom. for 2, we never had same problem tbh. 1 no clue.

lucky us then ! indeed GF.

lmao, but srsly letting ur best party getting rushed by 1 ~70 lvl and a mixed fucked up pt without heals (aka zerged) is just...

didnt turn out that well i guess... anw thx for being so nice.

my POV on last pvp is even funnier, i m hitting ppl in front and looking behind. if we do one thing well as SM is keeping our pts grouped. NOT! Btw i still wonder what stiba and the archers where doing while we rushed rip with 2 grps.

doubtful, he d never whine about enchant rate

about 1 good to know that. 2 i ve never seen but if u say so ok. 3 so u mean to tell me that any summoner, even without ss (which wont be the case at 2.0 about which we are talking about rn) isnt welcome in a melee 1v1 ? if u want to find a place in an archer pt, again i dont see why u should. thats not ur place. 4 u are right if u consider this purely time-wise. effort-wise tho i believe its obv that its harder to level up a tank than a summoner. for example at 1.3 top level was a warlock. guess what ? no catbuff back then. also one of the first 76 on our server was another warlock, even if we have the ultra bugged op orfen. not any tank even if they find party easy.

but it wasnt about party finding. in classic there s no party finding for 1-1 except raids. if u think the archers of the server got to 70 cos of raids then idk what to say. the change was made just cos of the pure difference in a melee cp farming aoe and an archer cp farming 1-1. if i ve tried as a tank making random duos/3man to 1-1 cos i was bored of aoe, i guess u guys can do it much easier. so its not about finding party its about finding the party u WANT. but this class wasnt made to xp aoe, it was made to xp 1-1. when u guys grow up and see that there isnt just aoe on this patch, and learn to use ur classes as they should be mb this discussion will end. since that wont be anytime soon idk whats left to be said. EDIT: and once again idk why we talk about it, since summoners believe their class will be "useless", so why would some1 reroll to it ?

wl needs at least 2 boxes. u need 1. wl has to worry about enemies. u dont. wl needs specific areas. u dont. the decision for the rogues was about the obvious difference between aoe xp and 1-1 xp. and u think a summoners 1-1 xp is worse than an archers ? still u are one tier above them.

OK i ll be serious now. The whole tier lists were made by taking into account 3 facts. 1) How ez is it to solo xp a char 2) How fun it is. 3) How useful they are in a party. Hence ee/se are T2 while they find party ez, and tanks T3. U try to find a balance between these 3 facts and since summoners are the best for solo xp, T3 are the best they can go imho. Lets compare bards tanks and summoners ok ? we got 6 tiers on each category. Solo: Tank 5 Summoner 1 Fun: Tank 6 Summoner 1/2 Party finding: Tank 1 Summoner 6 you can follow the logic and get ur conclusions. Ah, also first u guys whine that u ll be useless and then u dont want other ppl rerolling to ur "useless" class ? Doesnt make sense. Edit: In my example the tiers are the opposite of the way they are set, so not to get confused take it like 6->1 etc

well then lets make a tier of summoners ! tier ZERO ! shit, pp is so ez to find party, easier than nukers, mb put him last tier eh ?

y i wonder why... its so ez running around like a tard non stop (till u hit loa) to xp, compared to siting afk and doing 5 spells every couple of minutes.

i m done with satyrs. and mage groups. get me a PW and i ll "help"

well if i can have activity from 16-22 cet i dont get why i should set a strict eu prime didnt change prime or anything, it was always about when we had most active.

this thing cant exist

santas raindeers any1 ? i remember keeping a spoiler 25lvl to spoil some wolves at orc village and in the meantime i was getting overpriced event shit. mats for fp + money for top d.

dude from an ally called WuKong calling some1 else monkey is like... are we supposed to take it as a complement ?

dude it doesnt have to do with pts or asking kure. We had 1 ch and demoss "had" the other. The deal was u join as TT. U went with biz so w.e.

CH was for anathema, then CoB, idk what u mean. We had 2 not 3.

so this gives me an idea for a third alternative which could be: 3)0.4*1.8+0.2=92% ideas ?

so, just curious, in this scenario lets say he has 40% basic resist. I see 2 ways how it would work 1) He gets 0.4x1.8x1.2=0.864, so 86% resist. if he has like 50% basic resist this number becomes larger than 1, so i m guessing there is a cap also. 2) He gets 0.4 + 0.4x(0.8+0.2)=0.80, so 80% resist. What i mean is, do u calculate first the chance with LH for instance and then multiply the new value with the buff from core to get the final, OR u just add the buffs together and afterwards u calculate the resist chance ?

well soil declared first, i am innocent :>

agreed, but just to clarify, we ware allied with sm and half vigi since forever and since it was them or perkunas or other perkunas (uq) didnt seem like a choice. wasnt about trusting soil.

y and ppl say "this custom thing makes me useful" while 2/3 high level pts have boxes for that. screw logic. PS we can also box an elf (already have) just too lazy to do so. i guess i should reroll to ES to compete right ?

srsly, u dont like ur char ? reroll. why should i care about 1 freaking class when the whole group pvp is imbalanced. gimme some other reason pls. apart from that its a custom change that shouldnt exist on this patch for some reasons. if u dont see how imba it makes groups in certain situations u are thinking only for yourselves. PS feel free to remove tankbuff also.