MoDoy

any explanation why was topic about scamming monkeyzorg deleted? i was looking forward for the trololo comments, and now its deleted why is it like that?

​Why would they give Major Heal to EE when Greater Heal has the old effects? Greater Heal 29 active 114 0 2400000 600 - Restores the target's HP with 720 Power.Above is the final lvl for this skill for EE/SE, at 74. And below is the final lvl for this skill for Bishop, at 74: Greater Heal 33 active 120 0 2000000 600 - Restores the target's HP with 755 Power. I would rather suggest you remove Mass Cure Poison from Shillien Saint because it's a waste of SP and it only removes poison, while Mass Purify is better and removes poison, bleed, petrification and paralysis. And I still encourage the devs to introduce some sort of mana management system for support robes (not mp elixirs/pots) but either a passive or an active, and I'm not referring to Invocation. Or, rework Invocation in such a manner that it gives less mp, but you can still move and the effect is cancelled if you're hit, and lower the cooldown. You can use it more often and it would help you not to sit all the time for mana. Or bring those low/med mana herbs I've been mentioning everywhere on this forum. ​Umm Mass Cure Poison also a skill for EEs, except they don't have the Mass Purify to compensate, just another overpriced heal with poison/bleed removal Been playing since C4 and I don't think I've ever experienced a situation where I'd have to remove bleed/poison on multiple members so quickly I'd use this 200 MP skill (I think it was added this skill like at Hellbound where it made a bit of sense since kamalol zerks had that OP bleed which allowed him to make some combo, but it was useless ever since). It really feels like NCsoft wanted CPs to ditch EEs because they didn't like people using the Party Recall Really only nice thing they get that others don't is that Cleanse which also heals and recharges, but it's on level 80 which nobody is ever going to get and it's 20 minutes reuse. So I don't really think that asking for Trance is too much... ​gracia final, training 30-50 chimeras, that mass cleanse bleed could save u from wipe out but i cannot imagine other situations where that would be important skill

​u see? not everybody from us are doing that suicide tactic, and same goes for you, maybe not everybody is doing it, but there are many ppl from your side as well doing same tactic about building zerg and getting aden, yep, u could probably do that, but thats its, i dont know what would happen next, we were successfully defending it from you with +- equal numbers on last 2 sieges, but we might not be able to get it back as well with same numbers, but i dont give a sh1t, those greedy spastiks crested it for darkness so it gives xp back same as CH and they scammed me for 1k cp which i would have if it was for light, so u could take it and i wouldnt bat an eye also i dont care if u fought with 3rd side when we took aden (which are now your allies, also be careful of scammers in alliance, it could end very bad) or who opened oren, we crested them and thats what matters

​never said u have 1 castle, dont worry about my math knowledge as i said, i dont usually bring flames from different topics to new one, and i act towards what is in the topic (sometimes when i want to reply in more topics at once it might get a bit messy, but well, nobody is perfect), and now at the end ur replies started to be cocky, eventho ppl gave u reasonable arguments, your reply was nothing more than just some stupid picture showing your arguments in this topic, so i gotta behave towards u like this in this topic until it dies same as your hopes for getting aden castle PS: dunno what is situation now, but i doubt we count ES into our ally, i would still fight them on sight (i did even on sieges, coz i simply attack everything which isnt in CC and i dont give a sh1t what someone says, leave alone if biz writes somewhere in CC chat that we are not fighting them, while no normal sane person is looking at chat during sieges), only moment i wouldnt attack enemy is if my cp leader would say we are not fighting them right now or they would be in CC

​there were definitely ppl from all those 4 CPs, however i tried to count war tag images on video and i counted ~30-32, but some ppl could PR or bsoe behind corner which camera couldnt see (PS: they lost it coz i wasnt there )

​RS was never part of the olympiad set buff, coz stun wasnt that strong tool back in the time, it wasnt needed at all, however atm even mental shield with RS wouldnt help u against debuffs, coz their landrate is simply too high and for kiting vs DA, chain pull is your least problem because of kitty dmg and its cancel

​i dont need to make second accounts to vote for some bullsh1t poll, it was decided long time ago to have it like that (there was poll about it) i would say its convincing for you to have this xp loss, but only thing i see is CRP festival at your flags on sieges, so i guess its not u want to change things because u cannot get castle? how long is it now?2 months w/o castle? git gud pls i honestly dont get how it is messing real fights, when the numbers of ppl on each side is pretty similar, so the number of meatshields we have is same on your side, your ppl go on suicide mission as well as long as u have flags (too bad most of the time u even fail to put it) ​becoz you are on defensive side of aden, no matter what you will always have flag on aden garden and spam meat shield endlessly, and no stragety can really win the fight unless our side got x2 or at least x1.5 of your numbers, with some cooldowns, there will be more chances for offensive sides when suprised attack will turn the table if defensive side not carefully official server make it lost exp just to make sv more hardcore and require ppl have to play more srly and spend more time for the game, but were just a free and private server, easy come - easy go, lowbies will never dare to join the siege and become meat shields for any big sides, and its just bad, our population is not so hight actually so once again, cooldowns for respawn on flags is better, i prefer 30 seconds btw, or at lest 15 secs ​on last siege, when it started whole our ally was outside of the zone, when it started we got order to retreat and put flags, u lost fight outside of the zone w/o any respawning, thats why u couldnt go put flags immediately and continue fighting, thats the truth also when u put flags, we are able to somehow destroy them eventho ppl respawn on flags all the time (tho maybe u are failing on the side where ppl rather PR and wants to regen mp, so u are losing power, but thats your bad, ps: hello zorgzor) and also, as rizos said, defenders should have advantage in defending their own castle ​Yep we lost the fight because rezqquit was like "RUN INSIDE TO PUT FLAGS" So you were playing inside siege zone and spawning again ye okay that's a good tactic but still abused of non-penalty flags, when we putted flags they were 2 clans, not 8. So yes. Guys here is not about who is fighting better, dunno what i've done to you and you answer me like that but I'm sure biz is playing with your minds about me. All i'm trying to do here is to make better fights in CS. And btw first fight in last siege was nice because it was out of siege zone (Before siege starts) I'm sure you know that's wrong with no penalty at all in CS even if you don't admit it. I know somewhere deep inside you, you feel the same ​bizqquit didnt tell me sh1t, that spastik has little good tactics/leadership so i am not going to be sheep (like rizos, he gets the reference ), when we rushed in the siege zone to put flags and "abused" non-penalty mechanics, u could do exactly same, however u lost fight outside of siege zone w/o using it, i dont see problem what you have done to me? nothing, i dont have personal grudges most of the time, i just reply adequately to the replies in the topic i am writing into, if in your flames is some stupid bullsh1t/non logical thing/lie, i am going to flame you or act towards u like sh1t, and in this topic u tried to flame me how carebear i am and how i am making accounts just so my option wins, which is obvious lie, so enjoy the flame towards u as well as failord which couldnt take castle for 2 months so now he cries to admins in this topic i voted to not change anything, because there are ppl who are respawning every 10-20 seconds, and they might care about xp, however i am not rushing mindlessly into ppl like idiot, or trying to run w/o buffs (at least self buffs, which are kinda good on elf), and i am overall not dying a lot on sieges, so i wouldnt mind losing that 1-1.5% every 2 weeks

​good build classic server. it was opened over a year ago. It would be difficult to find a group to play together, because the bulk of players is already big lvl. And the new server do not want to open. About Pets. No pets there. ​its not that hard to get to high lvl, and if u try and dont play the most mainstream classes, u can find group quite easily

ppl are telling here what a tactic they had to use, but come on, u were cornered at heart, that fight could by no way called "kiting", and the push from wickedsick was not comming because they had 2 archer pts in their 3 pts, which are by no way good to push, since they have no burst dmg

​i dont need to make second accounts to vote for some bullsh1t poll, it was decided long time ago to have it like that (there was poll about it) i would say its convincing for you to have this xp loss, but only thing i see is CRP festival at your flags on sieges, so i guess its not u want to change things because u cannot get castle? how long is it now?2 months w/o castle? git gud pls i honestly dont get how it is messing real fights, when the numbers of ppl on each side is pretty similar, so the number of meatshields we have is same on your side, your ppl go on suicide mission as well as long as u have flags (too bad most of the time u even fail to put it) ​becoz you are on defensive side of aden, no matter what you will always have flag on aden garden and spam meat shield endlessly, and no stragety can really win the fight unless our side got x2 or at least x1.5 of your numbers, with some cooldowns, there will be more chances for offensive sides when suprised attack will turn the table if defensive side not carefully official server make it lost exp just to make sv more hardcore and require ppl have to play more srly and spend more time for the game, but were just a free and private server, easy come - easy go, lowbies will never dare to join the siege and become meat shields for any big sides, and its just bad, our population is not so hight actually so once again, cooldowns for respawn on flags is better, i prefer 30 seconds btw, or at lest 15 secs ​on last siege, when it started whole our ally was outside of the zone, when it started we got order to retreat and put flags, u lost fight outside of the zone w/o any respawning, thats why u couldnt go put flags immediately and continue fighting, thats the truth also when u put flags, we are able to somehow destroy them eventho ppl respawn on flags all the time (tho maybe u are failing on the side where ppl rather PR and wants to regen mp, so u are losing power, but thats your bad, ps: hello zorgzor) and also, as rizos said, defenders should have advantage in defending their own castle

​yeah, i guess u are right, still i hate when for example ppl do gang pts like 7 DDs 1 BP 1 EE, do full buffs on them and roam around, its pretty much impossible to win those if u are using normal pt setup

it was nice fight, finally we can see ppl running full necro setups however calling this 2 vs 3 pts is kinda close minded, look at your setup in pt, only DDs and healer, while we can see half pt of supports playing actively out of party supporting u about trying for ppl dropping on purpose, scum move, but maybe its your style so its w/e

​the problem is that they can use the same talismans as well. so we're back at square one. if by debuff champions you mean fear-locking classes: - any DA could just kite some talismans off, or pop up UD and wait until the talismans effects are off; - kiting goes for every other class with fear, with the difference that they won't have any other tools except running around to avoid talismans effects regarding debuffs. i still wonder why they didn't add buffs like mental shield in oly, considering that koreans love rng a lot. ​u can bait talisman on someone (pretend u are going to him, once u see him casting u retreat and kite it around pillar), use it at different time and try to get him with better corner cutting or if u have faster class (e.g. elves archer/dagger has like 10+ more speed than necro, so its much harder for necro to kite) if DA uses UD talisman, it doesnt give him debuff resistance, so u can debuff lock him on that talisman and try to burst once he is out of it every talisman has different uses, should be used with different timings and if one somehow messes up, u can turn that into advantage (e.g. i remember ppl trying to get 1 extra second on divine talisman on gracia final, however that cost them match, coz ppl canceled the casting one match started and 2 shotted them, just because they messed up)

​i dont need to make second accounts to vote for some bullsh1t poll, it was decided long time ago to have it like that (there was poll about it) i would say its convincing for you to have this xp loss, but only thing i see is CRP festival at your flags on sieges, so i guess its not u want to change things because u cannot get castle? how long is it now?2 months w/o castle? git gud pls i honestly dont get how it is messing real fights, when the numbers of ppl on each side is pretty similar, so the number of meatshields we have is same on your side, your ppl go on suicide mission as well as long as u have flags (too bad most of the time u even fail to put it)

w/o those talismans playing olympiad will be useless, 0 chance to outplay some classes which are debuff champions

​ ​sorry, but i am pretty sure option i chose is winning right now (ofc if we are not using your retarded measure of summing first and second option), and suggesting if first 2 options have more votes than third one and doing the poll between them again is retarded btw, whatever the change, i wont give a damn about it, i am dying literally like 3-4 times per siege (which would equal to 1% lost in total) its just other ppl wont come, and that would reduce my frag count on sieges

​its 21-13-20, if u wanted to have first and second one merged, u should have made "i want to change it", so ppl wouldnt know the change and would decide if they gonna risk it or no, coz i doubt ppl who voted for "i want respawn time" would vote for "add war like penalty" (maybe some yes, but i can guarantee not all) ​You dont get the point, there are 2 options but it's like 1. "We don't like it how it is now" Someone that voted for 1) or 2) they don't like the 3rd. So if 1+2 got more votes than 3, then must be another poll just for 1 or 2 option. And if that doesn't change, there's no sense of playing at cs. ​yes, if someone voted for 1, he didnt like 3rd option more, however that doesnt mean he likes second option, or maybe he would even prefer 3rd option before 2nd one​ ​ok, let me try to explain it more, coz u cannot get it i see *le me, who doesnt like the sieges at current state, but for sure i dont want to lose precious xp, because i am lazy lowbie, so i vote for first option to give reuse on the flags, however that doesnt mean i want to have second poll which will reduce the options to 2 options (same as in old poll) risking, that maybe the option with losing xp will win how does it even make sense to make same poll but with 1) and 2) options unchanged (excluding out third one), when it this poll one of those options have more votes? if somebody would prefer one of those, they would vote it here u made the poll how u made it, now stop tryhard because your option is not winning

​its 21-13-20, if u wanted to have first and second one merged, u should have made "i want to change it", so ppl wouldnt know the change and would decide if they gonna risk it or no, coz i doubt ppl who voted for "i want respawn time" would vote for "add war like penalty" (maybe some yes, but i can guarantee not all) ​You dont get the point, there are 2 options but it's like 1. "We don't like it how it is now" Someone that voted for 1) or 2) they don't like the 3rd. So if 1+2 got more votes than 3, then must be another poll just for 1 or 2 option. And if that doesn't change, there's no sense of playing at cs. ​yes, if someone voted for 1, he didnt like 3rd option more, however that doesnt mean he likes second option, or maybe he would even prefer 3rd option before 2nd one yes, i dont get the point because u cannot make point like that, thats not how questions with options work

​well, what is the difference in clan which is in ally and clan which is not ( i mean officialy) right now? its only that it doesnt have ally chat, and they dont have same ally name (WickedSick and W1ckedSick, wow), OL buffs/cp heals work just for clan, mass ress works just for clan, there is friendly fire on ally anyway unless ppl are in CC, literally only thing which differs those clans is ally chat i am not against it, eventho i wouldnt like the spam going on from zillion clans in ally chat when now its good place to communicate and joke around with other ppl in different time zones from other clans in alliance (3 clans is more than enough)

​just curious if greeks gonna get same punishment as some russians which swear on forum last time i remember i heard someone got 2 days ban on forum for swearing in russian ​I'm sitll waiting for driver-datplays to get punish for flaming here but nothing happened, so I guess i'll follow their idea. And srly modoy? Do you think that owners of server got special treatment to me cause I'm an ally leader? So what. flaming is fine, swearing is not, and i dont think monkey and scum is swearing, moderator doesnt ban/give warnings for that, however what u wrote is pretty similar to things some russians wrote in rusky and got punishment for it also i dont think u have special treatment, but u should know it as well, your excuses why u made this topic are lame, and just because u have known nickname on server doesnt mean its fine (tho what do u consider as special treatment? as far as i remember ally leaders had some special conversation with staff, to which i got rejected by sano :< QQ special treatment)

​its 21-13-20, if u wanted to have first and second one merged, u should have made "i want to change it", so ppl wouldnt know the change and would decide if they gonna risk it or no, coz i doubt ppl who voted for "i want respawn time" would vote for "add war like penalty" (maybe some yes, but i can guarantee not all)

Dear trash, I'm asking for 2.0 cause of new stuff are coming up. Bored of owning you all the time in 1.5 and watching bsoeing/PRing all the time, so a little oly, few more areas could make it better. I'm really waiting for you to see you use PR in toi areas. (Also read better, admins said they will announce arround October, so yes we're waiting for it) Now search more threads in post to flame. Trash. ​excuse me, remind me how many castles u have to talk about owning? As i thought. U can play with my jingle bells too many videos of ur ally pr came out nowadays to u talk about pr. Look at those jingle bells hanging, how about u play with em? go get a life, monkey scum ​t0 m0uni tis m4n4s s0u. We got 2 castles, with balls not easy pizi chineasy. ​just curious if greeks gonna get same punishment as some russians which swear on forum last time i remember i heard someone got 2 days ban on forum for swearing in russian

you not logging for few days and not knowing there was same topic made 2 days ago is NO excuse for being ignorant, next time use search and bump similar topics if u want to know answer imagine all the ppl who were few days off because of christmas would make same topic, yep, pretty much big mess and i doubt admins would reply in every of those, just because u are clan leader doesnt mean u should have special treatment

​coz nobody knows answer? except staff, which said they wont give info about 2.0 features we get before they realease official patch notes for us

​talismans/bracelets were in L2 for quite some time already, and i think it was good thing, it gave opportunities for some classes to win some matches in olympiad considering how debuff system works on classes, i think implementation of the debuff resistance talismans was a good thing, other way olympiad would look even more boring (also i was reading somewhere that its much easier to get those good talismans than it used to be (10 KE for random talisman, while out of 50 different types like 5 were useful), so now everybody can have them pretty much