Kure 444 Report post Posted October 31, 2017 1.14 Interfere with the other players’ gameplay, mechanically restricting their access to locations or NPCs. (for example, blocking access to the GC with summons, pets, transformations, etc.). There was this case even in a past (check) and a result was denying acces to RBs inside castles. It seems this "fix" wasnt implemented on 2.0 client so people started to abuse this game mechanic again. Its not some bug exploit but its against the server rules (nobody can access this NPC since doors are closed)... So... Is it allowed now or not? P.S. Its not bug abuse (neither its pretending D gemstones to be SOP) but according this server custom rules both those examples are prohibited apparently... Quote Share this post Link to post
Arcanum 312 Report post Posted October 31, 2017 considering who is the current owner of Oren castle, i'm not surprised. they deserve a ban regardless. Quote Share this post Link to post
V4siukas 58 Report post Posted October 31, 2017 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Arcanum said: considering who is the current owner of Oren castle, i'm not surprised. they deserve a ban regardless. You deserve perma ban on youtube for ur mindblowing videos!!! Edited October 31, 2017 by V4siukas Quote Share this post Link to post
Bambi 20 Report post Posted October 31, 2017 Come on, guys, the RB's are the only thing they had left. 1 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
weeeeD 118 Report post Posted October 31, 2017 The embarassing part is that they are hiding it from randoms..... 2 Quote Share this post Link to post
Kure 444 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 38 minutes ago, Stiba007 said: You are very poor create Kure. About RBs in Castle, i wrote about it with GMs before very long time back, if i saw some guys from enemies using castle on it. GM told me that is ok. So dont try be more ridiculous than u are right now and go puting more rats to our clans, more spy our ally TS, we dont care about sh.t like u. I will wait to confirmation from GMs that they changed their mind in last 10 months about how to aply this rule. Until then enjoy terrorizing randoms, after all they are only ones where you have some chance on defeating them. Not all the time tho (am I right JackRipper?). Cheers my dear. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
Reaper 84 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 38 minutes ago, Stiba007 said: You are very poor create Kure. About RBs in Castle, i wrote about it with GMs before very long time back, if i saw some guys from enemies using castle on it. GM told me that is ok. So dont try be more ridiculous than u are right now and go puting more rats to our clans, more spy our ally TS, we dont care about sh.t like u. On 12/24/2016 at 12:02 PM, Koll said: We will make not allow to run with boss in castle, because there are no competition is such move, other players can't get in castle. I am not an expert, but this doesnt seem that admin is "OK" with it. This kind of thing is called "exploiting" and what is worse is that it was known problem, yet someone is still doing it. I wouldnt be surprised if this gets hard punishment. Quote Share this post Link to post
V4siukas 58 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 (edited) Im wondering how does he manage to do such big camera distance on second screenshot :DD Edited November 1, 2017 by V4siukas Quote Share this post Link to post
Reaper 84 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 3 minutes ago, V4siukas said: Im wondering how does he manage to do such big camera distance on second screenshot :DD Like this maybe. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
FryderykChopin 853 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 6 hours ago, Reaper said: Like this maybe. meh~ In that case just make the infinity zoom as a part of the patch next restart, what's the point of keeping the small zoom just for some people? Quote Share this post Link to post
Rip 697 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 Btw on einhasad roa used to pull all mobs from ab/dv to clan hall after they finish farming Quote Share this post Link to post
Rizos 1487 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 It was fortress, and now its bannable even on official Quote Share this post Link to post
Rip 697 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 1 minute ago, Rizos said: It was fortress, and now its bannable even on official My bad then Quote Share this post Link to post
GanjaRockzZz 304 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 @San0 Can we have an answer? Before shitstorm start ? Quote Share this post Link to post
Arcanum 312 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 meanwhile, feel free to share the infinity zoom file 1 Quote Share this post Link to post
BlackJack 574 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 2 hours ago, Rizos said: It was fortress, and now its bannable even on official Like they will ever ban RoA On topic: just make bosses enrage so ppl kill at spot, ez life. Quote Share this post Link to post
San0 2419 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 dont invoke the name of San0 in vain. boys, we kinda have a bit too much in our plates atm, not easy to solve all the problms in the universe. also my opinion about this stuff is a bit different from koll and kse so i will leave this one up to them. Quote Share this post Link to post
kktnxbye 215 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, BlackJack said: Like they will ever ban RoA On topic: just make bosses enrage so ppl kill at spot, ez life. U are liar as always. THEY ACTUALLY DID. Some ppl from ROA were banned for 1 month. ppl from MTteam provided screenshots and video to admins on einhasad Edited November 1, 2017 by kktnxbye Quote Share this post Link to post
DrunkAngel 58 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 (edited) By "NPC" they mean npc, not monsters - gatekeepers, shop-store npc-s, quest npc etc. Otherwise there would be written "to locations and npc/monsters". NPC -non-player character (it also means nuclear pore complex but not here i hope ) - "character" is not monster Edited November 1, 2017 by DrunkAngel Quote Share this post Link to post
kktnxbye 215 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 I would add it in the rules and ban since the rule goes public. Would not punish (even admins on offi did so) ppl who did that before the rule change was made. It's bad for young randoms - new players who are the future of the server (thats why admins banned some RoA ppl on offi for 1 month). Quote Share this post Link to post
BlackJack 574 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 1 hour ago, kktnxbye said: U are liar as always. THEY ACTUALLY DID. Some ppl from ROA were banned for 1 month. ppl from MTteam provided screenshots and video to admins on einhasad I havnet played on ruoff since 3 weeks so i wasn't aware, you continue to be a total dumb ass though. RoA members advertise exp/items/ whatever service you are willing to buy as backgrounds on their streams and they haven't been banned for it years. Quote Share this post Link to post
Bambi 20 Report post Posted November 1, 2017 1 hour ago, BlackJack said: I havnet played on ruoff since 3 weeks so i wasn't aware, you continue to be a total dumb ass though. RoA members advertise exp/items/ whatever service you are willing to buy as backgrounds on their streams and they haven't been banned for it years. Tell us more about roa, we begging. Quote Share this post Link to post
valkynic 21 Report post Posted November 3, 2017 On 11/1/2017 at 4:43 PM, BlackJack said: I havnet played on ruoff since 3 weeks so i wasn't aware, you continue to be a total dumb ass though. RoA members advertise exp/items/ whatever service you are willing to buy as backgrounds on their streams and they haven't been banned for it years. howcome? you said you guys went there to dominate the server and now you quit? guess you dominated it to hard that you had to quit to give someone else a chance over there? Quote Share this post Link to post