Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/23/16 in all areas

  1. 3 points
    Pic says it all http://imgur.com/a/GmOHf
  2. 3 points
    HE pov OutOfControl CP
  3. 3 points
    EtoRazEtoDva is right. People who want play/sociolize - will do that. And also - ppl prefere their boxes because it always will allow them to exp solo and have buff/regen for pvp. And I don't think such a things easy to implement.
  4. 2 points
    ​warrior class skill formula always took into consideration P atk, so saying it doesnt affect skill dmg on warriors is bullsh1t (and yes, mages always profited and will profit from enchanted weapons more than any1 else) I know formula take it into consideration p.atk but it doesnt affect much on the final damage of a skill in some classes, like i said. I dont know all of the classes, alll of the skills, but dagger at least from what i know, so dont come trolling more omg. If you want understand me, u understand me easyly, if you want to troll, u will troll. Thanks, gl. ​hello, my name is benicepls and i cannot remember what i said 5 mins ago, and also i cannot read, because as could be seen i havent said ANYTHING (not even single word) about dagger, because i know their dmg isnt influenced by P atk almost at all i commented your statemened that warriors dont profit from p atk, which is wrong, but hey, maybe your argument that i am troll will work anytime i post something wish u gl as well
  5. 1 point
    ​ ​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ze8Z7oYqZE
  6. 1 point
    We have better support then your server have, so if you are interested - welcome
  7. 1 point
    regarding DA's fear: it would be nice to see some tests about that as well. i checked fear from WC recently, it was WC 71 against gladi 67 with no buffs, and the land rate was about 50% too. so now i'm curious about the land rate of all other fears from the other classes. if it's around 50% on every class without buffs, then it shouldn't be too much overpowered. on the other hand, if some specific skills are boosted, i'd like to know if it's the same on offi. 'cause you know, we already have custom skills nerfed for "balance" reasons, might as well test some more and see how it goes.
  8. 1 point
    ​It's not true though. Many people just need that little push. It's like saying that everyone who wants to donate to various causes will do that - that's not true, you need organizations to promote the causes to give people a little push to make them donate. ​If they need that "little push" , they dont want to socialize. Also everyone on this server will find a way to abuse this shit on high lvls to have this + %to exp
  9. 1 point
    So.. since Sayomi was in pub tonight (cheers mate ) i loged him and did some little test about LS landrate... Sayomi - lvl 70 (so LS skill lvl 70 also), test target EE lvl 63 NO buffs/epics... so that means it should be like 90+++% landrate as every other debuff in classic chronicle... but somehow relity is completely different, i did 30 lightning strikes and landed just 14 of them.. that mean not even 50% chance... i know to be precise we should do like 1000 not just 30 but even in this ammount its pretty clear that chance is very different... the thing is that landrate around 50% is even on blue mobs (i tested today as well)... Looking for somebody lvl 75+ (and maybe with epics to check if it helps or not) to test the landrate in level disadvantage (on classic 5+ level less means chance for debuffs below 10% if i am right - but i am suspicious the landrate will be different than it should be).. here is little video , i used same what @MoDoy did in dager test... "number" means succesfull LS, "number/" means resisted strike... Please forgive that wattermark... i downloaded first link on google after typing "video editing" and i am to lazy to crack it right now.... ​San0 are you really sure about that? I dont want to be drama queen - i understand you have plenty of work with 2.0 stuff but i guess it is at least worth checking (when you guys will have some free time) ...
  10. 1 point
    Wow, for me it is pretty clear, straight violation of server rules - about restricting access to NPC. I wonder if anything will be done about that.