According to this WS should be disbanded so many times already. They wanted aden >> they bite more then they can chew. Our bad perfomance and miscommunications on this siedge is the only thing which allowed perks to win these couple of fights. I would agree that it was fine thing to try Aden if the actual perfomance would be clear with these balcony fights. But see - from 8 pt only 4~ reached the balcony to make that choke point. Good for WS that we did even worse.
From strategic point of view - CHN supposed to def 3 castles from 7-8 BB pt. So we supposed to have clear WS vs DT pvp on Aden. With 6pt difference, with free perkunas clan to cast any castle - go for Aden? Too ambitious..
That a mess siedge was that...
And regarding zerg>> we are 3 prime ally, not 1 prime ally like WS, >3-5pt is from asia prime, 4 pt from NA prime, 7pt from EUR prime. The current structure is the only one which can allow us still be competitive for toi, baium, heroes, RBs.
Need to understand also that perkunas can afford now to play their 8pt mobile sharp-tooth army only because they took all they could to dominate eur prime and got this "fat" in the past. Usual circle of life on l2 servers > make zerg> dominate prime and epics> go from qty to quality.