Leaderboard

There is no need for restrictions on tk pala. Top clans/ cps will make them anyway, and few days more of xp won't make any difference for them, if you put restrictions only top CP and clans will have active tk pala, if you don't put restrictions then mby others will play them dreaming for the day they'll be 80 and not useless anymore

make drake boots +8 on reward list for next event, thanks

My summary: 1st priority is to prevent the fastest farming classes to class change to the lowest farming classes that have the highest pvp endgame potential = supports, inclusing sws. So its fine to have more than 1 group for now. Second priority: oly fatming: For da and es, they can have that penalty that can only change from it, not change to it, inside second group. I would argue to include necro. Third priority: pve disbalances within 2nd group: If you care enough, you end up with 3 groups as in the beginning of post. If not, 2 groups. Either way is fine for me.

LOA, DI, TOI, GC

i dont want players to say what i want them to say, but go on a topic that is about the new changes ideas for a old service and basically you idea is to keep the old service, its not the most ideal point of view needed in this topic. the service WILL be changed and that is a FACT. we just trying to figure out with players what people might be more interested in having, and as you can see is the players who are helping on deciding it when we could have just arrived here and announced wtv changes we wanted. Also this changes are happening due to the amount of player requests. and specially the amount of times that @Anytime asks per day when we planning on making changes on this service.