-
Posts
4373 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
302
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Event Calendar
Everything posted by San0
-
Soul breaker looking for guidance L2 classic
San0 replied to AntonioXander's topic in General Discussion
wrong forum guy! -
damn, the 2nd top 1 month java interlude/H5 server E Global doest it guys, guess we have no option here... we must follow...
-
wrong forum brah.
-
san0.classic isnt the skype name, its the profile name, profile names are unique. the link gives you the profile names, not skype names. searching san0.classic on skype may show you multiple with same name but only one of them will have san0.classic as skype profile.
-
i didnt say we changed paladins on propose, i said i doubt its bugged and your report can not be taken as 100% proof cuz not all the conditions are the same (gears, buffs, items, passive skills, augmts, runes and so on) values might be different for various different reasons. about the pet name color its a old client problm that is not possible to fix up to the date. about the fruits is not hard to change, you are not quite correct on how it works but its not a hard change its just a worthless change cuz leads to same end, you can only have one.
-
thank you for your time but most of this reports are not relevant or point to situations that were chosen by us to work like this. for example scrolls were made costum by us back in like 1.5 or something. bosses without minions allow for easier farm for groups progressing and similar things go for others the only i can consider from here is the boss spawning out of their place. fruits replacing each other at end leads to the same principle being you cant have both of them at same time, as for modoy and core when we changed we said thats how it will work in our server from no one so no changes will happen there either. for the paladin, i doubt its bugged to be very honest and if it works diferent from official, considering its one of the least played classes i dont see a nerf is in order.
-
it was explained on the same topic where it says it was turned off. its not a bug as in the interactions people were using with it are there as a mechanic same way they are there on official servers but we want to rework it to add/remove features from it and thats why it was turned off.
-
it was already said multiple times it was not a bug.
-
were you in floran vilage?
-
whenever they will be made and instaled on live server i cant tell the future boys all i can do is let you know on the changes logs after its instaled
-
almost al this type of skill apply to base values, not boosted ones.
-
stuff isnt even decided yet and you want etas already xD, whenever all will be decided there will be announce about change and time when change will start working
-
those are 2 diferent point in time xD, the 2 groups was indeed my first idea. after this talks i realized all in one group would make prolly late game faster to reach leading to more options and more entretainemtn for late game players and clans, and the banas part i always think someone will go bananas over everything we do, prolly cuz always someone will go bananas over everything we do.xD where i stand now, i agree 1 group only might be healthier for the server late game but will make many people mad. 2 groups seams to be the best way from what i see from most of peoples options. adding TK and paladin to first group might be at same time bad and good idea, good cuz they have strong skill on lvl 80 at same time bad cuz they are prolly the least played classes and would be interesting to balance this numbers allowing more people to change into this classes.
-
with all the boosts, all the newbie helps, all the raid bosses, all the events and all the rest, people already get to 79 really easy anyway as far as i see from the users comments.
-
í would go even further and argue that all in one group would be the healthier for the server to be really honest. just dont suggest it cuz dont want people to go bananas
-
and if it leads to more people playing actively in the late game where is the harm on it? one might argue that is unfair for who ever leveled their slow classes old school style but... in the end is it bad for the late game it self?
-
you guys missing the point of having the DA and pony on group 2, the idea is exactly giving more option for people to get out of this classes that are borken in some scenes like for example olympiad, leading to possibility of having less of this classes in the game which are now overcrowded.
-
why sorc and sps in diferent groups? they are kinda the same except sorc has body to mind untill lvl 40.
-
if the comand channel is on master loot drop option, the party with cc leader will get drop. if cc is not master loot drop anyone on cc can get drop. not a bug and it worked like this since i remember. i miss the days when people were fighting for a raid boss, instead of everyone jumping in the bandwagon and sing the kumbaya all together.
-
i dont want players to say what i want them to say, but go on a topic that is about the new changes ideas for a old service and basically you idea is to keep the old service, its not the most ideal point of view needed in this topic. the service WILL be changed and that is a FACT. we just trying to figure out with players what people might be more interested in having, and as you can see is the players who are helping on deciding it when we could have just arrived here and announced wtv changes we wanted. Also this changes are happening due to the amount of player requests. and specially the amount of times that @Anytime asks per day when we planning on making changes on this service.
-
sry thats not a viable idea as i mentioned before, this is basically a no changes idea for a service that no longer fulfill its main goal
-
class change service is changed/updated after every major server update. for example when it started there was 5 diferent groups cuz it was the best option for the game how it was back then, and with time game became more forgiving and fast forward and this limitations started becoming less and less. it is needed a update now as it needed many updates during the past 4 years.
-
this is virtualy no changes from the old sistem so why is it a option ? and the comment on increased size, makes me think you never rly fully read the main class change topic and you fully miss the propose of this service.
-
if you have a idea or opinion say it, otherwise just droping pointless sentences wont help anyone.