unique passive? what passive are you talking about? polearm mastery is not unique, destros have it, crafts have it, spoilers have it, yet they dont say only thing they should be able to do is AoE, do they? if you want to talk about unique skills, then yeah, WL has unique skill which is EXACTLY for the point when you go for 1 by 1 farming, why would they add this skill if that should never be the case for WL to go 1 by 1?
yea, i would say so that up until 75, WL can outlevel archers or mages killing outside of aden, honestly, i was never exping in that area, but i doubt you can do more xp after 70+ there than you can do with warlord in crater FP, so eventually, even if you could smh go faster at earlier lvls, WL would eventually catch up and even get in front of xp wise. if you talk about FOM raids and ABG raids which spawn at 21:00, it doesnt support any argument, it literally doesnt matter what class you play in those raids as far as i know, you just need to get party in CC and you dont even need to bother hitting, damage your class makes is irrelevant and unless you go for orc party out of CC for drops/xp, there is no difference if you are sws or WL or dagger or mage, so that kind of xp is same for any class
did you make it past the title? maybe you could go read the first post of the guy who made the topic? literally EVERY paragraph he wrote there was about WL<-> pvp, you are free to go and recheck
your average dagger definitely wont kill 1 char in 1 hit, unless its afk standing without buffs, i can guarantee you that, i am being dagger, i am WELL aware what daggers can do with proper equip, but i am also aware what warlords can do with proper equip
sorc/sps? you can make a good pt with them in GC, a CP of nukers to pvp are good, isn't it? and in the next pacht they learn new skills
Warlock/Phantom summoner? maybe elemental master eclipses all, but you don't see PS in olys?
Gladi have more chance to make stun with an axe and hammer crush than warlord
For spoiler/craft please don't compare, last week i finished farming my crafter.
PP is with WC the perfect box, yeah. But now pp learn 11skills, 11!!! I'm sure when u go to farm u take a PP with CC, isn't it? same as warlord
TK/SK are good but comparing to Pala/DA, yeah, it's not the same.
And now answer my questions in first post, when was the last time you give pt to a warlord? maybe you haven't got 3rd class change.
sorc or sps good in GC? only thing i am aware of is that IF mages actually farm in GC, they farm 1 by 1 and for that they use CDLs of necros and sph, not sorc/sps which will do 0 single target dps and will run out of mp in few minutes. now is the CP of nukers good for pvp? sure, it is, but you can specify it more to mage party of necros/spellhowlers are good for pvp
warlock and PS good in oly? sure, they are, are they good in other aspects of the game? nah, not really. that would bring question, if i can find 1 thing that WL is good at, does it justify the class and does it mean its good and doesnt need rework? i dont think so, you looked at 1 very specific aspect of the game and said "yeah, those classes are better", but in general, those classes are actually worse and many times they will perform worse than WL
gladi has more chance to stun with hammer crush than warlord? wrong, that just shows you are clueless about debuffs and their landrates
spoiler/crafter dont compare? why not?
PP is perfect box, well, okay? does it mean the class is good enough, because its the most convenient box? i guess not, coz otherwise they wouldnt make so many changes to it, right? and yes, people bring their PP with CC to farm, but for me thats exactly same as people bringing TK/pala for pvp and kicking him out of party right after he gives 80 lvl buff does it mean those classes are good just coz people bring them as boxes to pvps? not really in my eyes
TK/SK are good? in what universe are they good? sure, TK got recent rework where his stun goes through puri and instead of stunning you for half second, it actually stuns you for like 1.5-2s with 3s reuse, which makes you almost immobile, i will give you that TK is probably in better shape right now than WL because of bug
now answer from me to your last question would be irrelevant, the moment i still played was long enough and people could say "well, WL wasnt that bad back then coz not everyone had puri", but my party which still plays had WL in setup at some point, they had PS in setup, they had warlock in setup, hell they had stupid PW (me) in setup when the class was super garbage. why? because i liked the class despite it not being powerhouse, so yeah, even classes which are not meta i would invite to party, in the end its about how the guy utilizes the class