Cyane

https://twitter.com/TheRealSan0

I guess it was already reported, but just in case. Every time i invite a new pt member it appears this annoying message for all pt members to change to "Finders keepers" pd: now that i put it in random including spoil i doesnt do that anymore.. weird.. i think it happens when having pt in random or dunno

Yeah, or maybe adding more skill power to lethal shot would be an easier solution good suggestions overall

i agree about adding heavy armor mastery after lv 40+ (for both sws and bd). It was an official classic patch change, antharas i think*

i voted no, because i want bots to drop their gear when cc'd under mobs

up lf clan pvp any side, eu prime (no pve)

@Rizos you did some list some months ago (i cant find it) about many possible changes. One i remember that i liked was from nostalgia shop, prem acc for 1 day for example and many more

i think that big changes on gameplay like these, before they happen, would be good idea to from now on, to only have them first and only in test server for some time, so all ppl have time to test and give a feedback. You know, to prevent massive qq topics, and having to revert things back that cost for ppl a lot of investment on rollbacks, builds and so on (for example summoner and elder changes) and time from you as well free up

PVE: For frontal tanking, in place: paladin (sacrifice = auto heal non stop, some say heal drain too +more hp). Best for mele rb For any angle tanking, specially when running: tk (aegis+guard stance + heal cubic <heal while running>, +more speed). Best for aoe. PVP: both are trash compared to da/sk until 78+ when debuffs start to fail much often due to puri and chant, and in lv 80 pala/tk get 1 pt buff that any competitive cp wants to have

already reported here (april 12, zaken reports): 84.35% land rate with a sample of 147 tries bit its not yet approved nor received reply even :( i hope it gets fixed soon

yes, i remember too, it was fixed

False. P. atk doesnt have anything to do with if weapon is "same grade or not" nor if its "top" or mid nor low tier. Same weapon p.atk = same p. atk in status, thats the rule for d, c and b grade weapons. Its not the first time there is a wrong bonus after +4 for weapons (case of b grade before zaken) gj budesca pd pd: this is true even when comparing apples to oranges (weapons of different type<fist/bow>, grade<d/b>, tier<mid/top> and enchant<+8vs+0)

another posibility is to not change puri but add or change some skil to counter it. For exmple, by the same way rizos suggested to add -stun resist debuff on provoke on wl, i dont see a reason to not give something similar to overlords but applied to general debuffs to counter puri.. in other words: adding to ol an aoe seal debuff effect in some skill to decrease general debuff resistance on enemies around. It makes sense with ol's classic debuff role

Nice! did you find some script to take all data directly or just 1b1?

i miss (omg suddenly i can write :D) boats, wolves, heine, goddard and its hunting zones, MoS.. and for skills: old totem/rage mechanics cause they all were trade-ofs, they all had a purpose (not one totem being just sa superior version of the older one), old evasion mechanics, debuff landing was more complex (based on parameters and stats, tho that i understand its hard to calculate and balance right) and newer debuff mechanic that altough i didnt play god i readed that they implemented something to protect ppl from cc lock against same kind of debuff about mental on oly i dont agree cause switch / trick efectivness is greatly affected by it.. but if it was up to me to make 1 custom change, implementing the same mechanic that sleep and roots have on fear, would make fear a skill you have to time right giving sometimes to enemy a little bit of time to react instead of brainless spamming..even if you play da horrible. if you lock him with 1 fear, its pretty much over if you just hold that button on and hit.. in the other hand if fear was like sleep, you could only get perma cc if the user is really good at timing it in the right moment.. i dont say the same for stun f.e cause there are already many ways to protect against it and also cause its not unbreakable

BIG THANKS!!

up

any prime, spanish/english speaking pm me

captcha doesnt refresh sometimes, for example when you exit from your account with your navigator instead of "Exit" button Try pressing F5 to refresh captcha

poseidon on fire, part II

https://l2classic.club/forum/topic/11195-suggestion-about-evasion-stat/?tab=comments#comment-65121

Characters currently have 100% chances of landing any debuff (no matter skill lvl and target resistances) if target is 10 lvls lower or more than the caster. Test server: But according to official classic: Aw 55 resisting sleep from wc 78 lv. after guard expires Many stuns resisted by an sk 58 lv. against pr 71 1 Sword of symphony resist and 2 arrest resist (sws 71 vs sk 58) Experiment from official https://eu.4gameforum.com/threads/615413/ "Moreover, «Silence» skill land rate was tested for lvl 1 character and it was exactly 88%." "as it can be seen from the results, 10 levels difference doesn’t influence much the «Silence» and «Curse Fear» skills land rate." You can confirm that curse fear and silence land rate never changed, remained constant. It didnt matter if target had same lvl, or if it had 5 nor 15 nor 73 lvls of difference: Even a lv 1 should have the same base resistance of a target of the same lvl of caster. In our server, lvl difference gradually reduces target resistance until it becomes 0% with 10+ lvls of diff, and from that moment it cant be increased by any buff nor item (n * 0 = 0). except guard and mystic inmunity obv. I suggest for land rate of debuffs to not increase but to remain constant, as official, when the target is lower lvl than caster. Fixing this issue ll improve chances of lower lvl characters when they have proper debuff resistances due to items or buffs in oly and outside, like puri song or other buffs that a high lvl ally can provide to them for instance. pd: Do not confuse with the fact that skills work less against target of more level, that works as intended. This is the other way around: high lv vs Low lv. Ty

up also baium ring skill power bonus isnt affecting fatal counter dmg

No boats either T.T